March 1st, 2010 | The Blog, You're Being (Web) Paged
In this age of vanishing doctors and nurses, it’s like a war of the dinosaurs about who’s going extinct first. The current moves to expand scope of practice for nurse practitioners have drawn criticism from the American Medical Association, which has in turn drawn ire from the nurses.
The AMA cites the difference between a physician’s training and nurse practitioner training as the main reason for its reservations about expanding the scope of practice of nurse practitioners.
The scope of practice for nurse practitioners is based on state legislation, and several doctor-starved states are naturally looking at nurse practitioners as logical alternatives in various areas.
The problems start here:
The mature, genteel, considered response has been to fight tooth and nail over various definitions of who does what.
In California, physicians are suing to ensure nurse anesthetists are under supervision of doctors. This will do wonders for the health of lawyers, journalists and others, but not a lot for healthy relationships in the profession or with patients.
With all due respect to the AMA, there are a few physical realities which are going to cause havoc if some working options aren’t created, and soon:
There are no choices in this situation. The ultimate result, whatever the verbiage, will have to be “what works.” Everybody’s getting pushed over the edge somewhere, and what’s needed is a clearly understood practical working methodology so people can get on with treating patients. Guessing who’s supposed to be doing what will kill as many patients as any other indecision. It may even be as dangerous to human health as the billing process.

There are numerous outstanding and dedicated people in nursing but the leadership of organized nursing is vicious! The lastest outrage is forcing ARNPs to obtain doctorates because the PA-Cs won’t be able to compete and PA-C programs don’t have the resources to phase out less time consuming degrees.
I strongly agree with the previous writer. The vast majority of nurses would give you the shirt off their back. As a whole nurses are among the most compassionate people I ever met.
The problem is that they are represented by the most ruthless, underhanded, self serving, blood suckors in the political landscape.
I hate doctors.
Paternalism must relinquish its historical grip on the Doctor-Nurse dyad and humble itself to a respectful collegial engagement for the patients they serve to ultimately benefit from a true collaborative effort.
I am a national recruiter that works for hospitals across the US placing physicians and nurse practitioners, CRNAS and medical personnel in general.
In many of the rural communities, physicians are hard to recruit. It seems they all want the larger cities or the larger practice settings with many not wanting to take call!
That isn’t true for all settings but the vast majority of rural communities are in desperate need of experienced providers. They want providers that will stay in the community and become part of it.
If physicians would be willing to work in these rural settings that would be great but I find more NPs that are willing to move and work in an area that has no other providers to help the community. They appreciate the type of setting it is and aren’t afraid to take call either.